Advertisement
I was growing weary of all the negativity and non-constructive arguments in the original thread responding to the vet's email. So, I thought I would give everyone the opportunity to make a FRESH start, and check their attitudes at the door, so we can actually adress these VERY SERIOUS problems that are threatening PDF. So, allow me to repost on of my more recent comments from the thread that has since been buried underneath a bunch of shit:
After all that rambling, I think we are finally getting somewhere.
I will reiterate some of the things I have already said, and stress some points I have maybe not made so well:
Our community is one of "radical inclusion"
It is OUR responsibility to educate the newcomer; things like our ten principles, and policies at PDF that are outside of the principles such as the sound turn-down policy. It doesn't matter WHO in particular violates these policies or principles; it is WE as a community that are responsible, bottom line. Because, we are also a community devoted to "civic responsibility" and "communal effort". Problems with moop and sound are merely symptoms of a greater disease. Either we pull together and succeed, or divide ourselves and fail.
That's how I see it anyway...
And I'm just a "newbie".........
After all that rambling, I think we are finally getting somewhere.
I will reiterate some of the things I have already said, and stress some points I have maybe not made so well:
Our community is one of "radical inclusion"
It is OUR responsibility to educate the newcomer; things like our ten principles, and policies at PDF that are outside of the principles such as the sound turn-down policy. It doesn't matter WHO in particular violates these policies or principles; it is WE as a community that are responsible, bottom line. Because, we are also a community devoted to "civic responsibility" and "communal effort". Problems with moop and sound are merely symptoms of a greater disease. Either we pull together and succeed, or divide ourselves and fail.
That's how I see it anyway...
And I'm just a "newbie".........
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 9:22 AMSo, I welcome everyone to join in on the conversation. If this topic turns into a shit flinging contest again, I will simply delete the topic and remove myself from discussion. I will return in the spring as a Ranger, and I will do whatever it takes to help resolve these issues. Honestly, to me it is rather absurd; I have only been to two PDFs, but time and again, what I hear as recurring issues for virtually every PDF is sound and moop. You are telling me we can't have some system in place to resolve these rather simple problems?
People are leaving shit behind; don't leave until it is cleaned up.
People aren't turning their sound down after midnight? Shut off their power.
Repeat violators? Restriction of camping privileges up to and including banishment.
Does this sound harsh? I don't really give two flying fucks. What is more valuable: the "expression" of one or two sound camps, or the survival of the greater PDF community? -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 12:11 PMWell said Jonah. Flapping gums and and a million posts never gets shit done. Getting shit done gets it done.
My advice to you Jonah, dear motivated fired up giving a damn guy, take this chat to playadelfuego.org/bbs/
Make a rough plan, define your involvement, offer it up and see what happens.
Though that board has not been around as long, and isn't as purty, it's loaded with getting shit done people. I think you'll find more support and less gnashing of teeth there.
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 1:04 PMFunny, I mentioned doing that precise thing in an email I just sent to Smelly. While it is my intention to eventually take this to the PDF bbs and ultimately the board of directors, tribe is a forum full of burners that has proven to be a valuable sounding board in the past. Before we passed the 20 or 30 post mark on the last thread, the discussion did seem to be moving in a positive direction.
Then, I woke up this morning, turned on my computer, and a whole bunch of shit was flying around.
So, with this thread I am giving people the opportunity to return to civil discourse. If you want to bicker like a bunch of damn bitches, take it somewhere else. However, for the most part, I value your opinions, even from those of you who tend to be a bit blunt or abrasive. In fact, if anything, the gravity of this situation warrants that type of attitude. But, being direct in sharing your thoughts is not the same as finger pointing or name calling.
Let me also mention something else...
The solution does not lie in the implementation of new policy. Read the WWW; the policies we have are very explicit: sound turn down is at midnight. Don't put ashes in the dumpster, etc. What we need to do is figure out how to enforce these policies more effectively and educate newcomers more proactively. Perhaps abandoning the "non-confrontational" approach will be necessary, especially as it relates to our sound policy.
So, I open the discussion once more.
And don't forget:
YOU'RE DOIN' IT WRONG!!!!!!!!!
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 2:32 PMI would like to offer up the idea of the MOOP map that is put together each year of BRC. Break it down by camp, Red Yellow Green, public posting, public accountability. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sat, October 24, 2009 - 3:32 AMI like the moop map idea but it's hard when you have common areas or open camping area where you're not quite sure who was responsible directly for that space. I do agree though that shame works. If we can collectively grow a pair and call people on their shit (or mooping) then they will be less likely to do it. Dropping your crap around should be viewed as big a sin as showing up without a tent or food and expecting others to provide for you. I know i give the stink eye and a word or two to anyone I see running around with a feather boa (they shed!) and maybe that seems rude of me, but it's rude of them to do something that poo-poos on my event too.
I'm also on board with the DJs enforcing the sound limit on the DJs idea. They are the first people who lose if it goes from turn down to complete turn off. Again this works on the ccountability/shame idea.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 8:49 PMPertaining to the sound level issues... just my thoughts...
Perhaps the individuals who intend on DJing should be treated similarly to those who intend on spinning fire in the conclave: Attending a session to get all the rules and regulations straight. Perhaps after the meeting, a little badge could be given (similar to volunteer assignment badges) to vouch that the DJ attended the session and clearly understands/ is accountable for following said rules. Then no one could say "no one told me" if the sound turn down is not respected and consequences follow (although I don't agree with generator confiscation, due to other important uses of it, something to a similar effect could occur). However, the main issue with this is that people who want to play music arrive at all points in the weekend... how could so many meeting times be organized? Fire conclave is at one time, so making the meeting for that is more simple. If you miss that, then I'm pretty sure there's no participating in the conclave. Consequently, no DJ badge, no DJing? In the previous thread, someone suggested DJs policing the other DJs. I like this idea a lot! Checking around the theme camps once in a while for the 'badge' could really help make sure that people know when the sound has to go down. Playing music is very important to some people. I think they should be willing to help.
Another idea... at the gate, there could be something that people who intend to DJ have to sign off that they understand the rules, which also will make it "fair" to lose the privilege if the rules are not followed. If consequences are being doled out to delinquent DJs without "fair" warning, only anger will follow. The signatures will make a situation where no one can argue being shut down after breaking the rules. I know everyone who cares strongly about PDF, like I do, know the sound rules very clearly. But it seems the WWW and Tribe announcements are not enough for virgin attendees or selfish DJs to be clear on the *importance* of this rule. We need a mode of accountability. Yelling at the individual theme camp coordinators isn't the complete answer.
I don't really want to get into the moop issue too much, but tying into my point with sound: even virgin attendees should know the rule is "leave no trace" and "turn down at midnight" but the big issue seems to be understanding how *important* the rules are! Not just that they exist.
Man... I hope most of this made sense and I didn't repeat myself too many times :) I discussed with my boyfriend who has been to several PDFs with me, but DJed for the first time this fall, and he thinks it'd be totally reasonable to have more strict permissions for who wants to DJ and regulating each other, and whatnot. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 11:00 PMthe last thing pdf needs is more bureaucracy
as a dj in this community from the get go we have always had troubles in this area
and we have always found resolution
beefing up the sound patrol with djs would be a good idea if they are team with a non dj
i will gladly participate in this detail
having a camp representative from sound camps involved in self policing makes the most sense
holding them responsible for the djs in their camp also makes sense
badges and paperwork does not make sense
pulling gennys on camps that don't comply feels like a correct response as well
but only as a last resort -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 4:48 AMWhy not just have a "waiver" like everyone else has to sign? Maybe just post the Sound rules at the gate.
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 5:49 AMI think signing off on some kind of record of acknowledging the importance of the sound rules and possible consequences will help to make a difference, before sound camps become delinquent in the first place. I appreciate that community DJs in the past have found resolutions themselves, but there are many new individuals at PDF and people who decide that very night to play music who might need more explicit direction. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sat, October 24, 2009 - 1:37 PMsteph said . I appreciate that community DJs in the past have found resolutions themselves, but there are many new individuals at PDF and people who decide that very night to play music who might need more explicit direction.
monk e replies how about third strike is a bat w/ a nail in it to the head
i have always found i get my point across very well with that
yes perhaps all sound camps should get some sort of explicit direction
and those that are still delinquent should be shut down
its real easy to entertain at a reasonable level of sound and still feel it
its all about speaker setup and zoning your sound so that it makes an area of loudness and is not "broadcast" everywhere
-
-
SOUND PATROL - Positive Vibrations!...[also see the playadelfuego.org/BBS on this Topic]
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 9:13 AMI quote Jonah: "the individuals who intend on DJing should be treated similarly to those who intend on spinning fire in the conclave: Attending a session to get all the rules and regulations straight. Perhaps after the meeting, a little badge could be given (similar to volunteer assignment badges) to vouch that the DJ attended the session and clearly understands/ is accountable for..."
ENFORCEMENT of the Sound Policy [TBD].
I add this in a much light-hearted spirit of teamwork than my previous smarm session on the first thread.
I regret but agree with the idea of yet another 'LAMINATE' to hang on people's necks. So far we have:
- Rangers (Yes, even non-confrontational non-cops need stinking Badges!)
- Moop Team (so others won't mistake MOOPers for thieves or scavengers?)
- Participation Station (Many hang out there; it's hard to know who's doing what.)
- Gate (Duh...you don't want to turn your precious barcode over to a scalper!)
- DPW (??? Maybe these should be MAILED out to the Early Arrivals Listees?)
- Sound Patrol ("I have a dB meter and a walkie-talkie and I'm not afraid to use 'em!")
- SOUND EXPERT (I'm the one in this camp that the Sound Patrol is going to dump on, so just turn it down BEFORE they show up!)
It doesn't matter to me if the badge reads "Sound Patrol" or "Sound Mind" but the idea behind "SOUND EXPERT" is to remind violators of BOTH the training that might be done by the PDF Staff AND the actual knowledge of the sound gear that most DJ's already possess. After midnight, if somebody is DJ'ing music in their camp, he/she should wear a 'laminate' issued by the Theme Camp Leader, or somebody with the training and the 'badge' should be nearby the DJ booth.
WHY? - The concept behind "BANNING A THEME CAMP" for violation of a sound policy is ridiculous. Think about it?!? New name next time, and a new leader filling out the questionnaire. But the same people, the same sound system and the same ignorance can still buy tickets and cause the same noise complaints every event...at least until their individual participation starts to become obvious. And what happens then? The INDIVIDUALS are asked not to return, for the good of the community. Currently, some great Theme Camp Leaders have to take the heat for a vague sound policy with little to no expertise, or a consistent enforcement method. It sucks to be them!
Inevitably this is VOLUNTARY compliance: it only takes a few seconds of loud noise after midnight to generate a complaint. I admit to being guilty in the past of firing up the balloon burner; I never received any complaints then, but it could easily cause some, so generally I lock it away for the night. Even if a relatively quiet drum circle, or a little group cheering on a pole-dancer at 3AM, is not generating any complaints, it still doesn't mean that the camp next to them feels they need to overcome that sound by amping up their bass, "just for a minute or two while so-and-so is fire-spinning? Then we'll turn it back down." The overall BIG result of SOUND should be examined by AT LEAST ONE SOUND EXPERT in EVERY CAMP. (Just some voluntary delegate that was formally trained in PDF's Sound Policy, but not necessarily holding a dB meter OR a radio?) It's my opinion that people with the same training speak the same language, and therefore they communicate better, faster and wiser...and in this case, quieter also?
I would add that perhaps every Leader who sends in a Theme Camp Questionnaire should sign and 'check-the-box' that they "have read the Sound Policy and will either attend the PDF Sound Policy Training Session[TBD?]."
Every Theme Camp Leader would be answerable for this SOUND EXPERTISE, or have a member in their camp that they have appointed to attend the training and 'wear the badge' while the TCL is, uh, sleeping, for instance?
Why is this good? Because it would be best if there IS a noise complaint, that the Sound-Patroller that is dispatched to handle the complaint can find and speak directly to the SOUND person in that camp who is pre-designated as being responsible for knowing how to operate their camp's soundboard, speakers, amplifier(s), and generator.
In my few instances this past event trying to 'enforce' the Sound Policy, I was given unintentional run-arounds. Truly, I think it was unintentional...the DJ's knew how to work the soundboard, but not how to isolate the subwoofer and/or the systems' outermost speakers. The person who knew how to do that was not around, but somebody did volunteer "to go get him" and he showed up ten minutes later. Overall, it did take longer than anybody wanted to get the bass level turned down, and I didn't have any specific training or authority other than as a "newbie" Ranger responding to a noise complaint. Initially the complaint(s) came to me via the Ranger/Gate radios, and then escalated to an actual person-to-person request for a 'bigger, better' sound turn-down result. The noise level went down for awhile, but as often happens, it crept up as time went by. Part of this was just carelessness; part of it was just the result of 'tuning' by the DJ. That's where COMPREHENSIVE SOUND SYSTEM CHECK-OUT would be helpful to the DJ's; and this technical task can really only be done effectively by the Sound Systems' owners, designers and users IN COOPERATION WITH the Sound Policy ENFORCERS.
Gee, I think I got thru this long-ass post without using the F word? -
-
Re: SOUND PATROL - Positive Vibrations!...[also see the playadelfuego.org/BBS on this Topic]
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 11:56 AMI'm Steph, not Jonah =P but thanks! -
-
My Bad. I miscredited a good idea
Tue, October 27, 2009 - 8:24 AMI reread the thread and it WAS indeed Steph that first mentioned the DJ's attending a training session, not Jonah. Thanks for the positive input, Steph!
Humble Apologies,
- fr!tz
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 9:26 AMI agree with your points; beefing up on sound patrol is the most obvious solution. Having just one person trying to shout over loud-ass speakers to turn the sound down is difficult and often ineffective. If a polite reminder does not work, having one or two people to back that person up may be enough. If that doesn't work, then turn off their generator to show that you mean business. A reminder of the sound policies in the blissful silence that ensues would then be warranted. Providing they are then agreeable to the sound turn-down, they will be allowed to power their generators back up and resume the party. If they continue to violate the sound policy, then as a last resort, their generator will be confiscated until they leave the event.
Yes, generators have uses other than powering amplifiers. However, if you are unable to cooperate with sound policies and as such, abuse the priviledge of running a generator, either you can stay the remainder of the burn without power, or take your generator with you and leave. The problem comes down to one of enforcement. You can tell someone to turn the music down all you want, but if they don't cooperate, you have really two options: allow them to continue violating everyone's ear drums or turn the music down/off for them.
As far as moop, I think the moop map is a great idea, but where that will really only be useful is for theme camps, and I know for a fact that the theme camp area was moop-free when I left. How it is utilized at BRC is theme camps which prove to be moop problems don't get good placement the following year, or if they are repeat offenders, don't get to have a theme camp at all.
A possible solution I thought of last night is requiring one member of every theme camp to work a final moop shift, where they must moop the pavilion and walk-in camping areas in addition to their own theme camp area. Is this fair? I think so. Theme camps are responsible for entertaining our community, so they should hold some responsibility for the community as a whole. When people spend the weekend partying, at your camp or where ever else, they will leave shit behind. The fact is, regardless of awareness and education, some people just don't give a fuck if they come to a burn and trash the place. They only came for the party anyway. Are these people in the minority? Absolutely. But, I will say it again, it is our responsibility as a community to pick up after them.
Also, I was not aware that the responsibility of sound policing was basically removed from the Rangers this fall. I think this is a bad idea. While it may not be their "official" responsibility, I think the Rangers should oversee sound policy enforcement and moop proceedure (i.e. make sure the appropriate people are doing their jobs, and if not, take action), especially as it relates to theme camp compliance. Do some sort of "roll call" to make sure someone from every theme camp is there mooping. If no one shows from a given camp, push them to the back field next burn. Repeat offenders don't get to host a theme camp anymore.
It sucks that it has come down to this, but self-policing seems to have run its course.
Also, let me thank everyone for keeping the discussion civil and constructive. It would be nice to reach some sort of consensus. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 11:41 AMGreat points-- but having to set up some sort of d.j. meeting would be next to impossible. People come and go, and besides, what are we going to tell them besides "turn it down after midnight you self indulgent pricks!"? Yeah, we can talk about meters and db's and all that, but it comes down to policing and having the guts to go up to a camp and asking them to turn it down. I've done it many times and I hate doing it.
I think I'm going to start a rumor that I'M GOING TO CALL THE COPS if a camp gets unruly.Wouldn't that be evil? -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:32 PMAs far as the issues of sound and DJs...
Yes, organizing a meeting of all the DJs would be impossible and non-productive. However, someone mentioned something to the effect of having one person from each theme camp being on "point" for sound policy issues after the turn down, someone who is educated on the sound policy and is willing to take responsibility for their camp. This seems like it may just work. This way, not every single person who touches a mixing board has to be "cleared". But, every camp after midnight would have someone on hand that would be responsible for whomever is spinning (or drumming, screaming, whatever) at that time, hopefully to stop any sound issues before they occur, but would also be there to mediate between the sound patrol and DJs, so there would be less of a confrontation if a problem did crop up.
Oh, and if you are going to start a rumor like that, it would probably be more effective if you didn't announce it on a public board. :P
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 12:36 PMI really object just about any sentence that starts with "Theme camps should..."
Theme campers already commit their own money and time to building a space for everyone else to enjoy. They haul shit out there, they buy shit for people or for infrastructure, they organize and display talent for everyone to enjoy. The same can be said for artists who build exhibits at these burns.
Yet somehow it seems "cool" to expect theme camps to do more than say, walk-in campers. The theme camp application implies that every camp member is EXPECTED to pull a volunteer shift. In the thread about a shortage of firewood, people are saying "Those theme camp guys SHOULD buy more wood to cover the shortage so WE don't get cold." Now you, Jonah, are saying theme camps should form moop patrols.
Theme camps & artists are the heartbeat of any burn. It takes a lot of work and money, and to hear people try to place excess obligations on theme camps or tell us what we SHOULD be doing to make the burn better really rankles me. If anyone owes a debt to the community, it's the people in general camping who pitch a tent, party at the theme camps gifted to them, enjoy the burning artwork also gifted to them, and do little else.
Now I don't have a problem with people in general population and am grateful that they come to our camp and enjoy themselves and contribute to and augment the environment that we brought to PDF. But to try to load more obligations on to theme-campers' shoulders is totally back-asswards. In fact, I do volunteer-most of the time, despite that I'm usually one of the prime movers in my camp (Hüntenfjord this time, Tower of Power the past few times).
It makes about as much sense as arguing that anyone on the Board ought to be on a final moop patrol, or that anyone who builds a big piece of burning artwork really didn't do enough so they should pitch in even more.
That said, less experienced burners are more likely to be found in general population. The people who "heard about this cool festival and decided to check it out" are in gen-pop. That is where you're likely to find people who don't "get" the 10 principles yet, but may be open to them. Let's focus on getting more of the community involved and not try to pile more onto the shoulders of those who have already proven themselves to be the heavy-lifters.
To that end, why not organize a time to evangelize general population? Let's get a dozen or half dozen people together and take a page from the book of Hare Krishnas and the Mormons and do a missionary trip to gen-pop. We can wear white dress shirts and a tie with a name badge, roll up on people hanging out in gen-pop, pull a bottle of the good stuff out of our backpacks and sit and talk to them. Explain that NO ONE gets paid for PDF, that everyone there is just there to have a good time like they are, and no one is being paid to clean up after them. Explain the principles. Tell them to bring their own cup to the bars and to clean up their own shit. Encourage them to watch after their neighbors and that it's OK to suggest to your neighbor that they left some garbage behind and they ought to pick it up.
I'd be down for doing such a "missionary" trip next time around if others want to join me. Let's organize it ahead of time so we have a "theme." I really like the Mormon theme and the sight of "Mormon" missionaries at PDF would be a trip in and of itself. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:10 PMWell said Snail, I agree with you totally! And I would be so willing to join the Morman theme with you because in the end what it really comes down to is educating the virgins, newbies, firsties, what ever you choose to call them on everything Snail just said...
Again, well said, Snail!!!! -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:22 PMThis idea could be fun. PDF holy water, anyone! I'm bringing my sceptor...
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:19 PM"If anyone owes a debt to the community, it's the people in general camping who pitch a tent, party at the theme camps gifted to them, enjoy the burning artwork also gifted to them, and do little else."
I could not agree with you more. However, again, the problem comes down to enforcement. The fact is, the moop issue needs to be addressed, and we can't just shake our finger at the walk-in campers and say "you're doing it wrong". Believe me, I tried. It doesn't work. Perhaps I came off as a bit harsh in my last post. Maybe the answer is to devise some sort of incentive for whomever steps up and tackles this issue.
I have been a part of a theme camp both PDFs I have attended and have volunteered multiple shifts, including final moop crew. I get all the work that goes into a theme camp. However, asking one member from each theme camp to be part of final moop crew is not that much to ask. The task would be that much easier and would probably take half the time. The reason I brought up theme camps is that they by nature play a greater role in civic responsibility and communal effort. Everyone likes the part where you get to throw a wild crazy party and meet new people and all that, but when it comes time to clean up, there are much, much fewer hands on deck. What seems to me is happening at PDF is that too many people are practicing radical self-reliance when it comes to their own personal camps, but neglecting communal effort in recognizing that the entire grounds of PDF are our responsibility, not just where we happened to pitch our tent or theme camp.
"Leave no trace" means just that: NO trace... -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:48 PM"If anyone owes a debt to the community, it's the people in general camping who pitch a tent, party at the theme camps gifted to them, enjoy the burning artwork also gifted to them, and do little else."
I don't entirely agree with that statement. A lot of the people that are camping in general camping up front area, work volunteer shifts either for the gate, rangers, DPW and PS, or come in early to help set up the event. I know I worked many sifts as well as my camp mates and don't fell like being apart of a theme camp. I have been apart of theme camps and I personally camp in general camping so I can get a few hours of sleep in the late morning and hot have to lessen to music being played at four in the morning. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 7:21 AMMartie, I specifically pointed out people who camp in general camping and "DO LITTLE ELSE."
Now would your examples of people who (from your response), "work volunteer shifts either for the gate, rangers, DPW and PS, or come in early to help set up the event" fall into the category of those who "do little else?"
You are arguing over something that was never said.
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 3:12 PMOk i feel a response to this is appropriate. Seeing as how Ive camped in "Gen pop" ever since my first burn, and im a DJ i feel i should say a few things.
1. I LOVE GEN POP. Honestly i would say where we camp at Fogie its about 90% veterans in our general area.
2. Being a DJ i know both sides of this coin, As a DJ I love loud music... but I know not everyone does at 4 AM (Which i dont spin at this time for many reasons) So the simple solution to this is to turn up the monitors a little and turn the main system down. It tends to make me think im playing louder then i actually am, without blasting bass.
3. I Hate the 4 AM dj blasting the psytrance just as much as the next guy. And trust me... I would have told them to turn it down, had it not been 30 below away from the camp fire at that time and my extreme hatred of being overly cold. So really its my own suffering and cant really bitch there.
4. I've noticed by hosting Camp Fogie and putting on other events that although it is a communal effort between all the camp members, that although you try and distribute responsibilities that 2 people end up doing at LEAST 50% of the work. But honestly i dont expect any different on this one.
5. Without gen pop what would be the point of putting on your theme camp?
This is by no means a flame... just a post about the other side. btw i DO agree and DO see what your talking about. But i did hear Thank You a MILLION times over the weekend which makes the gifting worth it IMHO.
-
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:55 PMSeems to me that if a theme camp allows a dj to spin at their location, it is THEIR duty, not pdf's to educate and inform on the rules of spinning there. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 4:34 PMDear Fellow PDF Folks:
I do not see why this has become such a hot topic. I was a virgin at the Spring event and I knew that sound was to be turned down at midnight and trash was to go into the approriate trash can. Sadly I chose not to camp at a theme camp for the Fall becuase I was tired of hearing all the noise from nearby theme camps. It seems to me that we just need to enforce rules already in place rather than to make new rules for the sound and moop issues.
Just my two cents.
John
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 1:51 PMI bring my radical expression with me so I'm keeping my attitude. Do with yours what you will but I'm cool with hearing people's honest thoughts.
Yes, it's a community of "radical inclusion".
It's also a community of radical responsibility. Self-education shouldn't be out of the picture. Meaning when new, you find out what the rules are and it's in multiple forms both online and in print. I don't see how folks don't know regardless of how long attending.
Surely if new folks come who don't really know about moop or the general well-publicized rules, hopefully their campmates or random encounters of new burner friends would point this out to them. While still at PDF, the pavillion was cleaned out and according to those who did this was worse in previous years than this burn. I imagine if this is true on it being better than previous, part of the reason may be because it was getting really bad there for quite awhile.
I love the idea of a moop map. I'd step up to help with a file out for a few of these. I know our space and the two beside it were totally clear including the cig butts that looked at least several months if not longer old but didn't do a huge dpw type sweep this year.
I don't think banning people for violations if they didn't know is a way to go as came up about a year ago when this same topic of sound came up with a new camp. I do think calling people on things is a totally reasonable way to approach it, which was done at the event (with no change) and afterwards. The whole concept of patrolling about sound is quite subjective, even with the dec. meter in hand if there's not a coherent setting it almost seems like a wasted exercise compared to doing the actual talk to people approach. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 7:07 PMHuman beings are pretty predictable. The more that responsibility for "enforcing" rules are allocated to the few the more complacent others become. Truth be said, if we are a burner tribe then moop, safety, sound turn down etc is everyone's responsibility. How do we know this is true? because if we keep passing off this responsibility, it is every one of us that gets thrown out.
I have had the lovely experience of trying to talk down a very large angry neighbor dude from driving his pick-up (gun rack and all) right into the middle of PDF to set us straight once and for all (two springs ago for the same fucking issue). The threat of violence was way wrong but his anger was justified.
There are some excellent ideas being posted here. Let's solve this people, the survival of PDF is at stake here.
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 9:38 PMIn my experience people turn down at midnight and creep back up peaking around 2-3am.
Basically I've never had a problem getting a DJ to turn down even with no laminate at all, telling them I'm not in charge, but their sound is carrying very far and someone else might come sound patrol them or whatever. It ALWAYS works.
The thing is, if nobody is sound patrolling them, they just figure its fine and crank it up. The whole concept of a sound patrol basically urges them to turn it up in the absence of someone telling them not to.
In their defense, they're behind the speakers and dont hear how loud it is 300 feet away in front of their speakers. Sound patrols help because they can actually walk around and see how loud it is at a distance.
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 8:14 AMdo you people have anything better to do with your time than to complain about that same damn issue over and over again? Seriously.... 700 word essays are not necessary. If you have that much passion, put your energy into actually changeing something rather than just ranting on a message board.
Just like Obama, you're all willing to talk about how you would change things...
but you'll never actually do a damn thing about it -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 8:43 AMGeorge Bush in 2012! Because he knows how to get shit done!
hehehehe -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 12:50 PMyou're right, her certainly did get shit done...
I don't agree with what he did obviously...
He's a doer, not a thinker...
thats why Kerry lost to him, he was to much of a thinker
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 1:53 PMDo you have anything better to do with your time than bitch about other people's posts? Or do you just not have anything constructive to add to the discussion?
If you knew me at all, you would know that I back my talk up with actions. For instance, this PDF I volunteered for 4 shifts including supervising an opening gate shift and final moop crew, attended Ranger training, organized three spinning workshops, spun in the fire conclave, and camped with a theme camp. What have YOU done for PDF lately?
I am trying to get some feedback from the community before I attend the post-PDF planning meeting in November. So, that way, I can weigh in not just with my own ideas, but hopefully some sort of general consnsus. Unlike you, I value the opinions of my fellow community participants, which is why I solicited their input in the first place.
So, if you don't have anything to add to the discussion, please take your posts and negativity elsewhere. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 3:08 PMwho are you talking to jonah ?
if you are calling me out on not being constructive
i think you missed my points
if its not me then please call them out by name because based on when you posted
it seems to imply that i have nothing constructive to say
the bat comment was said with sarcasm, if you knew me you would know that
and i don't think it detracts from what i said
as for what i have done for pdf lately
your pic gallery has the answer to that question
people.tribe.net/9a23d87e-...b36ce47c32
i helped make that happen
and my feed back is the answer is out there but more paperwork is not necessary
i am not bitchin -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 3:21 PMI dont believe he was talking to you monk e.... sounds more like Michael. Its ok. Unlike Cameron, Michael actually is a knob. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 7:07 PMBTW, Matt, I am glad to hear that you and Cameron have made up:P Was there cuddling involved? -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Mon, October 26, 2009 - 6:27 AMOnly late night by the fire... when i couldnt find smelly.
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sun, October 25, 2009 - 3:56 PMI was responding to michael's post. Sorry for the confusion. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Mon, October 26, 2009 - 9:45 AMJonah, Monk E, Everyone else...
See, that's what insecure little prits like Michael do...
They sit around looking for a vulnerability, post a caustic comment, and hope to publicly engage you in their public stupidity.
Better yet, they hope to get two other people fighting so they can sit back by their keyboard, read the ensuing conflict & wack off to their negative creation.
I can't imagine going through life like that. Must be painful...
Oh well, once again radical inclusionism gets tested.
Perhaps the best strategy is to not engage. Who knows, maybe Michael will learn some manners, and how to participate positively, through osmosis.
L -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Mon, October 26, 2009 - 11:00 AMno offense taken i was just making sure
and to restate its always a good idea when calling someone out or otherwise
putting a verbal beatdown on them to actually use their name in your response
as sometimes things get posted in-between rants
and others might lose tack of who's arguing with whom
this keeps the stupidity down, generally.
some people never learn
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 2:30 PMI will be bringing a friend of mine in the spring who just so happens to be a super hero that battles MOOP on a daily basis. He may need to find a sidekick for sound turndown, though. PM me if you know anyone. :) -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 2:38 PMAll of Camp Fogy should do sound patrol! They could wander around with their megaphones and yell at DJs "What is that crap you kids are listening to! Turn that noise down! You're doing it wrong, get off my lawn!" -
-
Unsu...
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Thu, October 22, 2009 - 5:33 PMThey be Fogified! -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 5:37 AMHmmmm......I will bring that up at the next Fogie gathering, but I would be willing to bet that all Fogies will be down for that ;-)
-
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 9:13 AMFirst of all, let me extend my thanks to everyone for the overwhealmingly positive response to this topic. Allow my to post a portion of the agenda from the upcoming post-PDF meeting in November, as it relates to this thread:
1. Sound Problems
a. Possibility of Theme Camp Sound Registration
b. Sound Patrol (how do we give Sound Patrol "enforcement
authority"? The enforcement issue may be something we have to take to the
board, since they deal with evictions and such.)
2. Clean Up Problems
a. Creation of a Moop Map
So, "the powers that be" are taking steps to address these issues; really, this should not be a big surprise to anyone. I will try to attend the meeting via conference call to see how things go, and weigh in as it is appropriate.
However, this does not meet we should stop the brainstorming process. As I mentioned before, the responsiblity falls on ALL of us to weed out these issues. We can't rely on the board or a handful of rangers or sound police to keep everything under wraps, 100% of the time. Snail had the idea, and started his own thread pertaining to the "baptising" of virgins by missionaries who will educate them as to our principles. Now, it looks like we have camp Fogie stepping up to help with sound policing. I can't say how thrilled I am about all of this, you guys. Because really, it doesn't matter what the board decides, if we aren't there to support their decisions as a community. I, for one, am not about to have my burn ruined by a bunch of goddamn whipper-snappers.
Let the ideas continue to flow... -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 9:18 AMDamn Whipper Snappers ;-) How I love that phrase!!!!
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 9:52 AMIf the MOOP problem was mostly in open camping and the pavillion, I'm not sure what good a MOOP map would do. I thought I read the theme camp areas weren't bad. I suspect the theme camps feel responsible for their areas... they know that if they leave the place a wreck, it will be known. Open camping and the pavillion on the other hand are fair game.
I'd like to see MOOP patrol be a volunteer position. I know we are lacking for volunteers overall, but I also know there are times when the gate has too many volunteers and people just standing around. Perhaps we can re-think the number of volunteers actually needed at the gate during the latter part of the weekend, and recommission those slots for MOOP patrol. Or, when there's gate staff up front with nothing to do, send them on MOOP missions and have them focus on open camping and the pavillion.
I also propose we obliterate the word MOOP from our vocabulary altogether and call it what it is... TRASH. Newbies don't know what the fuck MOOP is, but they know what TRASH is. Moop is cute, Trash is not.
As for abiding by sound restrictions... what happened to the idea of a sound patrol with a decibel meter? A DJ gets one warning... turn it down. Two warnings... turn it off. Three warnings... you're not permitted to DJ at the next PDF - a seasons reprieve to rework your sound management skills.
I can't help but wonder... if sound was such an issue this PDF, were there no complaints during the event? Noone noticed or said anything? Really? If someone was aware of it during the event, did they do anything to try and rectify it? Why not? Why are we learning of it after the fact? I'm not making any accusations here... I'm just trying to understand why someone who observed it as an issue, didn't feel it was their right or responsibility to say or do something about it. Perhaps that needs to be addressed as much as the sound issue itself.
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 10:30 AMThere were complaints, and something was done, apparently enough to last the weekend.
Sound turn down started EARLY on Sunday because of complaints Saturday. Most DJs were
quite good about turning things down when told at that point, and apparently reminders only
needed to go out when new DJs took over, or if the equipment had been off for a while.
I don't know how things went with sound patrol during Friday/Saturday night.
I agree with a 3 strikes enforceable policy with sound meters. Give the sound patrol the
authority to turn off someones generator, and take it to the board if it goes beyond that. I wouldn't
want to touch anyones stuff (and I'd be nervous about killing a generator without letting them
turn their equipment off, we don't want to damage anything, but at the same time, they've already
been warned, will they comply with turning things off? I guess if you said "I'm turning your
generator off, you've got 2 minutes to get your equipment ready). -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 11:40 AMIn reading through this, it doesn't seem that enough was done to last the weekend, or this wouldn't be an issue.
Perhaps we should issue sound permits, just like the DMV issues permits for art cars at BMan? To get a permit, every DJ must be listed and sign an agreement honoring turndown. You get a permit, you can have a sound system. A DJ doesn't heed the first warning? Permit revoked. A theme camp doesn't honor a warning? Permit revoked and no placement the following burn. This is ridiculous that we're having these conversations burn after burn after burn. -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sat, October 24, 2009 - 1:43 PMdust y said
Perhaps we should issue sound permits, just like the DMV issues permits for art cars at BMan? To get a permit, every DJ must be listed and sign an agreement honoring turndown. You get a permit, you can have a sound system. A DJ doesn't heed the first warning? Permit revoked. A theme camp doesn't honor a warning? Permit revoked and no placement the following burn. This is ridiculous that we're having these conversations burn after burn after burn.
monk e replies
the last thing we need is more paperwork
we need better sound patrol w/ dj presence
as a dj who has been on the otherside of this discussion i think a 2 person team of dj / non-dj would allow
for better interaction between sound patrol and sound camps
i am throwing my hat in the ring to do this and will work with the sound patrol coordinator to make this happen
WE HAVE ENOUGH REGULATIONS , WE DON'T NEED MORE PAPERWORK -
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Mon, October 26, 2009 - 3:57 PMAgreed about not needing more paperwork. This should be dealt with
diplomatically, but still needs feet on the ground to ensure it happens.
Anyone with ideas or willing to help with this matter are encouraged to
show up at or call in to the Nov 14th planning meeting.
-
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 11:07 AM"If the MOOP problem was mostly in open camping and the pavillion, I'm not sure what good a MOOP map would do."
This was my opinion at first, but after chewing on it, I realized that going through the process of creating a moop map would mean that any remaining moop would be removed in the process, and not left for the vets to clean up. Moop proceedure would have to be more thorough, plain and simple. Of course there would be the benefit of seeing exactly where the "violators" were camped, and having that information available to everyone who attended the burn. This way, you could see if you or one of your neighbors left anything behind. At the very least it will create a higher awareness of where any leftover moop is, and it will ensure that the grounds are clear before we leave.
As far as sound patrol...having decibel meters doesn't really cover the whole picture. Subwoofers need to be turned OFF after midnight; you could be within "safe" decibel range but have bass traveling a mile or more, or conversely, if your woofers are off but your music is still loud, your immediate camping neighbors might be bothered, but the sound dissipates after a few hundred yards. Determining if a subwoofer is turned off is very simple and does not require any sort of special equpiment...simply walk over and place your hand on it. If it is vibrating, turn it off.
-
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 12:55 PMUnlike what Drunken Fraggle did Sunday morning, I intend to make Spring PDF really about giving it back, at least for me, anyway. I've got lotta responsibility issues, m'self, and what better place to improve one's own character than PDF? I'm building a costume known as the MoopMan. That or Mr.PocketTrash...I'll be toting around several garbage bags and whatnot. Sound solid? I wanna do that. Anyone up to doing something similar? It'd be great to have a crew of people dressed like pieces of trash, themselves, picking up after ourselves...
ML,
~F -
-
Sound Issues was Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Fri, October 23, 2009 - 2:54 PMThought it'd be a good idea to copy and paste this hear so it may get additional attention:
Hello All,
I'm Heidi, the PDF Theme Camp Coordinator and wanted to...
1. Explain how Theme Camp Registration works and sound.
2. Ask for complaints to be emailed. (not posted to Tribe)
But first read:
1. How registration works:
-A Theme Camp registers their Theme Camp by filling out a questionnaire. The questionnaire asks for a "Camp Leader". That Camp Leader is responsible for what happens in their camp. If there is a problem they are the one taking responsibility for their camp.
-The" Camp Leader" is specifically asked if they are a "Loud Camp" and must explain.
-They are then asked... "Are you and ALL members of your Theme Camp aware that our wonderful hosts have a mandatory rule that sound must be turned down at midnight?"
So...
The organizers/coordinators know exactly which camps are the "loud" camps and what specific person is taking responsibility.
2. Sound violations (not just complaints)
-If there is a sound violation (loud after midnight) it can be immediately discussed and resolved with the "Camp Leader".
-Yes, take action immediately. Don't just complain about it later.
OK, so if you really think there is a Sound Camp that needs "talking to". Please email directly to themecamps@playadelfuego.org.
The shorter the email the better.
Thanks for listening.
Heidi
-
-
Re: Let's try this again! (Vet's email response)
Sat, October 24, 2009 - 3:59 AMfor the moop map, I wonder if it would be possible to make land allotments for camps that are not theme camps? I know there's a group of us who camp by the chopper and we're not a theme camp but every one of us volunteers (we totally embrace the SHUNNN SHUNNNN SHUN THE NON-VOLUNTEERRRR system) we often feed people, a chunk of us play with fire and often are out and about helping others or adding to the event (we also have a fire pit and chairs and invite the passerby to sit with us, we call ourselves "crashpad" ). We'd love to be able to take the responsibility for the chunk of grass we cover, that way we could be held accountable on the moop map. I believe Camp Foagie also camps near us, they too would be probably be willing to be held accountable, and a large portion of the other folks near the chopper and the front gate have also formed mini-camps because of how long they've been there. Would it be possible to have a land agent for a non-theme-camp camps? It's already second nature for us to do a sweep of the area after the cars have been loaded anyway.